Saturday, June 9, 2012

Nets Nets in Italy: Vianini Industria



Italian Net Net: Vianini Industria (09/06/2012)
Usually, when someone is looking for Nets Nets he turns his view to the land of the rising sun: Japan. However, the European economic crisis caused a huge decrease in European markets, especially in the shares of companies quoted in the peripheral countries, such as Italy, Spain, Greece, Portugal etc. These circumstances create big opportunities in the stock market and some big mispricing in the shares of some firms. Therefore some Net Net situations have surged in recent months. The first Net Net I am going to talk about is Vianini Industria, an Italian firm quoted in the Italian stock market. Vianini is not a good business, it produces cement structures like pipes, piers, cement structures for railroads and aqueducts, etc. The firm is not that profitable, it is not a good business, it is not in a good sector and it is part of a group called Caltagirone SPA, a group with more than 5.000 employees, 1,5 billions in revenue and it is owned by Francesco Caltagirone (54%). Mr Caltagirone is an Italian entrepreneur who, in 2011, was condemned to 3 years in jail for insider trading and has other problems with the law, so we cannot be shure of the integrity of managers and owners and probably this fact is discounted in the market price. Vianini has a Market Cap of 33,5 millions and an EV of -21,8 millions. The firm is not profitable and it is probably worth more dead than alive. This is the reason why I am going speak about the assets of this firm. The interesting thing is that Vianini has 31,8 millions in cash and this means that 95% of market cap is made of cash and has total liabilities of 9,9 millions. Moreover, besides cash, Vianini has 25 millions € (31/12/2011) of available for sale securities: 21 millions € in shares of Generali (Insurance company) and 4 millions in Cementir (Cement producer), both companies are quoted in the Italian stock market. Today (09/06/2012) these shares are worth 20 millions and if we add them to the cash figure we come up with 52 millions against a market cap of 33,5 millions. Here are the Net Net calculations (I want to thank Oddball stocks blog for the format of this spreadsheet):

  

 Input
Per Share
Multiple
Discounted Value
 Pert Share
Cash & Equivalents
 31.842,00  
 1,06  
100,00%
 31.842,00  
 1,06  
Restricted Cash

 -    
100,00%
 -    
 -    
Marketable Securities

 -    
100,00%
 -    
 -    
Cash Total
 31.842,00  
 1,06  
100,00%
 31.842,00  
 1,06  
Accounts Receivable
 4.706,00  
 0,16  
75,00%
 3.529,50  
 0,12  
Other current asstes
 24.607,00  
 0,82  
75,00%
 18.455,25  
 0,61  
Receivables
 29.313,00  
 0,97  
75,00%
 21.984,75  
 0,73  
Inventories Total
 8.392,00  
 0,28  
50,00%
 4.196,00  
 0,14  
Total Liabilities
 9.876,00  
 0,33  
100,00%
 9.876,00  
 0,33  
Property, Plant, and Equipment
 7.088,00  
 0,24  
10,00%
 708,80  
 0,02  
Shares Outstanding
 30.105,00  










Net Current Asset Value
 59.671,00  
 1,98  

 48.146,75  
 1,60  
NCAV + Fixed Assets (PP&E)
 66.759,00  
 2,22  

 48.855,55  
 1,62  
Net Cash
 21.966,00  
 0,73  















Price Per Share
 1,11  




NCAV + Fixed Assets (PP&E)
 1,62  




Price / NCAV + Fixed Assets (PP&E)
68,40%





The adjusted Net Current Asset Value is 1,60 per share against a market price per share of 1,11. If we add adjusted PP&E we come up with a value of 1,62 per share. Therefore, the market price has 68,4% discount against the NCAV. In this calculation I put 24,6 millions of other current assets that are something like loans to other controlled parties. Maybe these assets are not that “shure” and recoverable, but we must remember that among the assets (non current) there are also 20 millions of available for sale securities, therefore I think that the firm, from the balance sheet point of view is undervalued. Stated book value per share is 3,24 (31/12/2011), however PP&E is almost fully depreciated and the original cost has been 60 millions so probably its value is more than the net book value and the firm says that it has 48 millions of PP&E (cost) that has been fully depreciated and it doesn’t appear in the balance sheet, but some of this PP&E should have some value in case of a liquidation. Therefore, in a supposed liquidation the firm is more valuable than what the price of its shares show at the moment. Below we calculate the Net Current Asset Value including marketable securities and writing down intercompany loans by 50%:


 Input
Per Share
Multiple
Discounted Value
 Pert Share
Cash & Equivalents
 31.842,00  
 1,06  
100,00%
 31.842,00  
 1,06  
Restricted Cash

 -    
100,00%
 -    
 -    
Marketable Securities
 20.117,76  
 0,67  
100,00%
 20.117,76  
 0,67  
Cash Total
 51.959,76  
 1,73  
100,00%
 51.959,76  
 1,73  
Accounts Receivable
 4.706,00  
 0,16  
75,00%
 3.529,50  
 0,12  
Other current asstes
 24.607,00  
 0,82  
50,00%
 12.303,50  
 0,41  
Receivables
 29.313,00  
 0,97  
75,00%
 15.833,00  
 0,53  
Inventories Total
 8.392,00  
 0,28  
50,00%
 4.196,00  
 0,14  
Total Liabilities
 9.876,00  
 0,33  
100,00%
 9.876,00  
 0,33  
Property, Plant, and Equipment
 7.088,00  
 0,24  
10,00%
 708,80  
 0,02  
Shares Outstanding
 30.105,00  
 2,89


 2,09  






Net Current Asset Value
 79.788,76  
 2,65  

 62.112,76  
 2,06  
NCAV + Fixed Assets (PP&E)
 86.876,76  
 2,89  

 62.821,56  
 2,09  
Net Cash
 42.083,76  
 1,40  















Price Per Share
 1,11  




NCAV + Fixed Assets (PP&E)
 2,09  




Price / NCAV + Fixed Assets (PP&E)
53,19%





Adding 20 millions in marketable securities and writing down 50% of intercompany loans I come up with a value of 2,09 including 10% of Net PP&E and not including the 48 millions that have been written down to zero and do not appear on the balance sheet. The original cost of PP&E on the balance sheet is 108 millions and I give to it a value of less than 1 million so I am really conservative in the asset calculation.
Conclusion
Vianini Industria is not a good business and it is not a profitable one but from the balance sheet point of view it is deeply undervalued. The problem that I see is that there is no clear catalyst that can disclose the hidden value. The firm is part of a holding company owned by Francesco Caltagirone and even if it is more valuable dead than alive, I do not think that the CEO is willing to liquidate it or try to disclose some value in any other way. However the discount to the NCAV is so big that it could be a good investment with not many downside risks and a good upside potential.
Disclosure: I do not hold a position in any issue mentioned in this post.

No comments:

Post a Comment